Add

Guest post: No special rights for lifestyle choices


This is a guest post from James Dominguez.

Right now in this country, and around the world, huge numbers of wicked, self-entitled people are demanding that the government grant them special rights based on their lifestyle. That’s right! We’re not talking about in-born traits here (no matter what these sickos claim) but a conscious lifestyle choice.

For some reason, these people think they can demand special treatment from government, special exceptions from our traditional laws, and special human rights that aren’t granted to anyone else outside of their sordid little club. How on earth could this be constitutional?

People can’t help who they are, or where they were born, or the circumstances of their birth. Disallowing discrimination based on these inherent traits, such as race or disability, makes sense of course. The problem is that these shrill, demanding people want us to believe that even though they have chosen this deviant lifestyle long after birth (some of them not even acting on these impulses until very late in life!) they are entitled to all kinds of legal protections and special rights.

No reasonable person could possibly agree with this. If you make a choice to join a minority group based on weird behaviours, then you know that you are buying into any negative consequences that go along with that. Don’t want people to treat you badly? Don’t choose to join in with this destructive lifestyle! It’s so simple!

Hopefully I’ve convinced you by now that these people should be denied any kind of special rights and protections. Please join me in spreading the word about this widespread injustice:

People who choose to join religious groups should not be granted any legal protection against discrimination.

I mean honestly, it’s not like it’s something they’re BORN with, like sexual orientation!

Disclaimer: No, I don’t really think religious groups deserve no protections: everyone should have the legal right to live their lives in peace. But seriously, why is the religious right still using such an easily reversed argument?

Oh, and thanks for letting me guest-post, Rebecca! :)

 - James “DexX” Dominguez

Related Posts:

No comments yet.

Respond

get in on the action.

* Required

Random Posts Recent Comments

  • mimbles Says:

    Further to the couple unit thing, your thoughts on how finding out about poly as adults in a monogam...

  • Ariane Says:

    I'm picking out one tiny point in a long post of awesome, but your comment about identifying people ...

  • Ariane Says:

    And if, like me, you're really good at justifications, you can even manage to not realise that shame...

  • Utopiana (Celeste) Says:

    Thanks so much for including my stuff! Looking forward to the gigantic read-a-thon...

  • Helen Says:

    Thanks so much for the links Bec. This is a monster of a DUFC. I can see I will have this page open ...

  • Rebecca Says:

    Oops, I fix that as soon as I can Orlando. Thanks for pointing it out :)...

  • Orlando Says:

    Thanks for the feast. Small correction: I put up the post about Zerlina Maxwell, she wasn't blowing ...

  • Chally Says:

    Thank you so much, Rebecca, for your always amazing dedication to DUFC....

  • Mindy Says:

    Fantastic carnival this month Bec, thrilled to have been included. Lots of great reading to keep me ...

  • canbebitter Says:

    fantastic carnival! thank you so much for putting this together, looking forward to getting stuck in...

Tag Cloud

abuse bisexuality body body image catholic Christianity differences disability DUFC equal marriage exclusion family fat Feminism gah gender gender roles growing up health history identity Language lgbtiq me media minority rights people politics polyamory privilege racism rape relationships Religion review science fiction sexism story stuff thoughts trans* travelling USA violence WTF